Introducing Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual
Text to speech in 11 Indic languages and English, with 50+ voices, code-mixing, instant voice cloning and context-aware pronunciation.
We’re releasing Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual, a text-to-speech model for the way people actually write and speak. It can switch languages mid-sentence and use context to read prices, dates, abbreviations and symbols aloud.
Multilingual speech for real applications
- 11 Indic languages and English. Generate speech in Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu and English.
- 50+ voices. Choose from the voice library for conversational interfaces, narration, learning and other voice applications.
- Code-mixing across all supported language pairs. Generate speech from sentences that combine any two supported languages.
- Instant voice cloning. Create a voice from a few seconds of reference audio and use it to generate speech.
- Up to 1,000 characters per generation. Generate a complete response or passage in one request.
How the model reads text in context
A written amount needs the right spoken value and currency. An abbreviation needs an appropriate expansion. And the same symbol can mean different things depending on what surrounds it.
Table 1 · Illustrative verbalization decisions
| Written expression | Appropriate spoken form |
|---|---|
| ₹1,250 | One thousand two hundred and fifty rupees |
| Chapter IV | Chapter four |
| Blood group B+ | Blood group B positive |
| A grade of B+ | A grade of B plus |
Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual makes these decisions in the model itself, reducing the need to maintain custom normalization rules or write separate prompts to prepare text for speech.
Three tiers of speech evaluation
We measured how faithfully the model conveys the intended words, how accurately it interprets written expressions, and how an automated evaluator scores the resulting audio. Chariot ranked first on the three metrics below among the configurations compared in our 11 November 2026 evaluation.
7.60%Hindi character error rate · Lower is better
93.78%English verbalization accuracy · Higher is better
4.901Plain-English NISQA · Higher is better
Table 2 · Three-tier evaluation framework
| Tier | What we measure | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligibility | How faithfully speech conveys the intended content | Hindi and Indic character error rate ↓ |
| Reasoning accuracy | Whether written expressions receive an appropriate spoken interpretation | English verbalization accuracy ↑ |
| Quality | The quality of generated audio, estimated by an automated evaluator | Plain-English NISQA ↑ |
Tier 1 · Intelligibility
We transcribe the generated audio with automatic speech recognition and compare the transcript with a normalized reference. The resulting character error rate (CER) measures how faithfully the speech preserves the intended content.
On the Hindi suite, Chariot records 7.60% CER across 644 configured prompts, covering general, robustness and native conversational text.
Table 3 · Hindi intelligibility
| Rank | Model | Hindi CER ↓ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual | 7.60% |
| 2 | ElevenLabs v3 | 8.00% |
| 3 | Cartesia Sonic-3.5 | 8.06% |
| 4 | Sarvam Bulbul v3 | 8.21% |
| 5 | AWS Polly | 8.40% |
| 6 | Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash | 8.41% |
| 7 | OpenAI TTS-1 | 8.90% |
| 8 | Microsoft Azure MAI-Voice-2 | 9.72% |
| 9 | OpenAI TTS-1-HD | 16.02% |
The nine-language Indic suite covers Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil and Telugu. General text includes assistant and commerce phrasing, robustness text adds numerical and technical expressions, and conversational text comes from IndicVoices-R.
Among models with complete coverage, Chariot has the lowest nine-language average CER on each dataset. It also has the lowest average CER in eight of nine individual languages when the three test sets receive equal weight.
Table 4 · Nine-language Indic intelligibility
| Rank | Model | General CER ↓ | Robustness CER ↓ | Conversational CER ↓ | Three-set mean CER ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual | 8.24% | 9.14% | 2.05% | 6.47% |
| 2 | Sarvam Bulbul v3 | 8.93% | 9.62% | 2.07% | 6.87% |
| 3 | ElevenLabs v3 | 11.42% | 11.32% | 2.39% | 8.38% |
Tier 2 · Reasoning accuracy
We define reasoning accuracy as verbalization accuracy, the share of judged outputs with an acceptable spoken interpretation. The English suite has 1,029 sentences across 42 categories, including currency, dates, ordinals, URLs, chemical formulas, stock tickers and codes. Chariot achieves 93.78%.
Table 5 · English verbalization accuracy
| Rank | Model | Accuracy ↑ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual | 93.78% |
| 2 | ElevenLabs v3 | 93.51% |
| 3 | Cartesia Sonic-3.5 | 89.92% |
| 4 | Microsoft Azure Dragon HD | 89.29% |
| 5 | Sarvam Bulbul v3 | 88.19% |
| 6 | Cartesia Sonic-3 | 87.33% |
| 7 | Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash | 85.25% |
| 8 | Cartesia Sonic-2 | 85.10% |
| 9 | Microsoft Azure MAI-Voice-2 | 83.12% |
| 10 | OpenAI TTS-1-HD | 74.19% |
| 11 | OpenAI TTS-1 | 72.67% |
Tier 3 · Audio quality
We use NISQA, an automated speech-quality predictor, on 1,088 plain-English prompts from Seed-TTS-eval. Chariot records 4.901, the highest score among the compared configurations.
Table 6 · Plain-English predicted speech quality
| Rank | Model | NISQA ↑ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual | 4.901 |
| 2 | ElevenLabs v3 | 4.896 |
| 3 | Cartesia Sonic-3.5 | 4.860 |
| 4 | OpenAI TTS-1-HD | 4.804 |
| 5 | Cartesia Sonic-2 | 4.798 |
| 6 | Cartesia Sonic-3 | 4.785 |
| 7 | OpenAI TTS-1 | 4.692 |
| 8 | Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash | 4.689 |
| 9 | Sarvam Bulbul v3 | 4.641 |
Try it with your own text
Start with a sentence that mixes languages or an amount, date or abbreviation your application needs to say aloud.
Evaluation methodology
The evaluation suite includes 8,655 configured text cases across English and ten Indic languages. Each table ranks the model versions included in that benchmark.
- Intelligibility. We compared transcripts of the generated audio with normalized references. The nine-language summary gives equal weight to each language and dataset.
- Verbalization accuracy. We judged whether the audio gave an acceptable spoken reading of the input. Accuracy is the share of resolved judgments marked correct.
- Audio quality. We used NISQA to estimate the quality of the generated English audio.
The scores come from Chariot’s TTS Evaluation Standard: Proposal. The benchmark datasets are linked below.