Introducing Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual

Text to speech in 11 Indic languages and English, with 50+ voices, code-mixing, instant voice cloning and context-aware pronunciation.

We’re releasing Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual, a text-to-speech model for the way people actually write and speak. It can switch languages mid-sentence and use context to read prices, dates, abbreviations and symbols aloud.

Multilingual speech for real applications

  • 11 Indic languages and English. Generate speech in Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu and English.
  • 50+ voices. Choose from the voice library for conversational interfaces, narration, learning and other voice applications.
  • Code-mixing across all supported language pairs. Generate speech from sentences that combine any two supported languages.
  • Instant voice cloning. Create a voice from a few seconds of reference audio and use it to generate speech.
  • Up to 1,000 characters per generation. Generate a complete response or passage in one request.

How the model reads text in context

A written amount needs the right spoken value and currency. An abbreviation needs an appropriate expansion. And the same symbol can mean different things depending on what surrounds it.

Table 1 · Illustrative verbalization decisions

Written expressionAppropriate spoken form
₹1,250One thousand two hundred and fifty rupees
Chapter IVChapter four
Blood group B+Blood group B positive
A grade of B+A grade of B plus
Chariot authored these illustrative examples to show how context changes the spoken form.

Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual makes these decisions in the model itself, reducing the need to maintain custom normalization rules or write separate prompts to prepare text for speech.

Three tiers of speech evaluation

We measured how faithfully the model conveys the intended words, how accurately it interprets written expressions, and how an automated evaluator scores the resulting audio. Chariot ranked first on the three metrics below among the configurations compared in our 11 November 2026 evaluation.

7.60%Hindi character error rate · Lower is better

93.78%English verbalization accuracy · Higher is better

4.901Plain-English NISQA · Higher is better

Table 2 · Three-tier evaluation framework

TierWhat we measureMetric
IntelligibilityHow faithfully speech conveys the intended contentHindi and Indic character error rate ↓
Reasoning accuracyWhether written expressions receive an appropriate spoken interpretationEnglish verbalization accuracy ↑
QualityThe quality of generated audio, estimated by an automated evaluatorPlain-English NISQA ↑
Lower CER is better. Higher verbalization accuracy and NISQA are better.

Tier 1 · Intelligibility

We transcribe the generated audio with automatic speech recognition and compare the transcript with a normalized reference. The resulting character error rate (CER) measures how faithfully the speech preserves the intended content.

On the Hindi suite, Chariot records 7.60% CER across 644 configured prompts, covering general, robustness and native conversational text.

Table 3 · Hindi intelligibility

RankModelHindi CER ↓
1Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual7.60%
2ElevenLabs v38.00%
3Cartesia Sonic-3.58.06%
4Sarvam Bulbul v38.21%
5AWS Polly8.40%
6Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash8.41%
7OpenAI TTS-18.90%
8Microsoft Azure MAI-Voice-29.72%
9OpenAI TTS-1-HD16.02%
Lower CER is better. Hindi scores average results from three speech recognizers.

The nine-language Indic suite covers Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil and Telugu. General text includes assistant and commerce phrasing, robustness text adds numerical and technical expressions, and conversational text comes from IndicVoices-R.

Among models with complete coverage, Chariot has the lowest nine-language average CER on each dataset. It also has the lowest average CER in eight of nine individual languages when the three test sets receive equal weight.

Table 4 · Nine-language Indic intelligibility

RankModelGeneral CER ↓Robustness CER ↓Conversational CER ↓Three-set mean CER ↓
1Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual8.24%9.14%2.05%6.47%
2Sarvam Bulbul v38.93%9.62%2.07%6.87%
3ElevenLabs v311.42%11.32%2.39%8.38%
Lower CER is better. Rank is based on the mean of 27 equally weighted language–dataset scores. The mean can differ slightly from the average of the rounded columns.

Tier 2 · Reasoning accuracy

We define reasoning accuracy as verbalization accuracy, the share of judged outputs with an acceptable spoken interpretation. The English suite has 1,029 sentences across 42 categories, including currency, dates, ordinals, URLs, chemical formulas, stock tickers and codes. Chariot achieves 93.78%.

Table 5 · English verbalization accuracy

RankModelAccuracy ↑
1Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual93.78%
2ElevenLabs v393.51%
3Cartesia Sonic-3.589.92%
4Microsoft Azure Dragon HD89.29%
5Sarvam Bulbul v388.19%
6Cartesia Sonic-387.33%
7Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash85.25%
8Cartesia Sonic-285.10%
9Microsoft Azure MAI-Voice-283.12%
10OpenAI TTS-1-HD74.19%
11OpenAI TTS-172.67%
Higher accuracy is better.

Tier 3 · Audio quality

We use NISQA, an automated speech-quality predictor, on 1,088 plain-English prompts from Seed-TTS-eval. Chariot records 4.901, the highest score among the compared configurations.

Table 6 · Plain-English predicted speech quality

RankModelNISQA ↑
1Chariot-1-TTS-Multilingual4.901
2ElevenLabs v34.896
3Cartesia Sonic-3.54.860
4OpenAI TTS-1-HD4.804
5Cartesia Sonic-24.798
6Cartesia Sonic-34.785
7OpenAI TTS-14.692
8Sarvam Bulbul v4-flash4.689
9Sarvam Bulbul v34.641
Higher NISQA is better.

Try it with your own text

Start with a sentence that mixes languages or an amount, date or abbreviation your application needs to say aloud.

Evaluation methodology

The evaluation suite includes 8,655 configured text cases across English and ten Indic languages. Each table ranks the model versions included in that benchmark.

  • Intelligibility. We compared transcripts of the generated audio with normalized references. The nine-language summary gives equal weight to each language and dataset.
  • Verbalization accuracy. We judged whether the audio gave an acceptable spoken reading of the input. Accuracy is the share of resolved judgments marked correct.
  • Audio quality. We used NISQA to estimate the quality of the generated English audio.

The scores come from Chariot’s TTS Evaluation Standard: Proposal. The benchmark datasets are linked below.